Topic summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video1,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil & Military Relations results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 417 hits. Analysis detected 4,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,741 of 16,562 topics). This Civil & Military Relations is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Civil & Military Relations
Topic details
Total words: 5,068
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos