Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Workers results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 1,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (6,982 of 15,539 topics). This City Workers is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
City Workers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.1% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Straw Man: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos