Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These City Politics results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 1,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This City Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
City Politics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos