Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video867 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Policy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 58.1% saturation with 1,511 hits. Analysis detected 4,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,601 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,627 of 16,562 topics). This City Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
City Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,601
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.1% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 58.1%58.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.8%25.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.7%7.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 58.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos