Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cinema Events results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 47.3% saturation with 1,794 hits. Analysis detected 7,497 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,795 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,593 of 16,562 topics). This Cinema Events is worse (more manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group.
Cinema Events
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠85%Cinema Events (selected)7%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,795
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.3% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 47.3%47.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 34.1%34.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 23.1%23.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 47.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 34.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos