Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Olsen results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 3,918 hits . Analysis detected 16,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,355 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,199 of 6,359 authors). This Mark Olsen is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group. Mark Olsen
Author details
Total words: 12,355
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.4% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 31.7% 31.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 25.8% 25.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 25.8%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.8%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst