Topic summary
97%1 analyzed article/video535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cia Report results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 399 hits. Analysis detected 2,809 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,605 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,755 of 15,757 topics). This Cia Report is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Cia Report
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,605
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.5% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 13.5%13.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.8%20.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.5%15.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.9%24.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Straw Man: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos