Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,082 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Church And State Relations results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 1,830 hits. Analysis detected 9,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,463 of 16,562 topics). This Church And State Relations is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Church And State Relations
Topic details
Total words: 8,328
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.0%22.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos