Topic summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video1,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chula Vista City Council results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 525 hits. Analysis detected 2,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,243 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,569 of 16,562 topics). This Chula Vista City Council is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Chula Vista City Council
Topic details
Total words: 3,243
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.2%16.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos