Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video784 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chronic Fatigue Syndrome results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 49.2% saturation with 1,157 hits. Analysis detected 4,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,372 of 16,562 topics). This Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Topic details
Total words: 2,352
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510091.7% percentile
9.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 49.2%49.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 17.0%17.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 34.7%34.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.2%12.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.1%11.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.1%15.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Topic 49.2%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 34.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos