Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Christopher Nolan's Films results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Bandwagon, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48% saturation with 557 hits. Analysis detected 2,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,161 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Christopher Nolan's Films is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Christopher Nolan's Films
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Christopher Nolan's Films (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,161
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 48.0%48.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 23.3%23.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.5%14.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 48.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos