Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video466 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christmas Traditions results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 409 hits. Analysis detected 1,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,398 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,731 of 16,562 topics). This Christmas Traditions is worse (more manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
Christmas Traditions
Topic details
Total words: 1,398
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.5% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 29.3%29.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos