Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video411 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christmas Photo results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 388 hits. Analysis detected 3,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,233 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of ā 92% (1,346 of 16,562 topics). This Christmas Photo is worse (more manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group.
Christmas Photo
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 92%Christmas Photo (selected)10%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,233
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510091.9% percentile
9.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 22.4%22.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 25.2%25.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 31.5%31.5%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 14.0%14.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.5%17.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.1%15.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.5%19.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.6%9.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 31.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 25.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Horn Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Personal Incredulity: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos