Topic summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video1,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Choirs results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 563 hits. Analysis detected 2,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,039 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,484 of 16,562 topics). This Choirs is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Choirs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,039
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.5%18.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos