Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chip Design results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 447 hits. Analysis detected 2,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Chip Design is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chip Design
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.5%11.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos