Topic summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinese National Arrest results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 290 hits . Analysis detected 2,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of â 84% (2,783 of 16,562 topics). This Chinese National Arrest is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group. Chinese National Arrest
Topic details
Total words: 1,816
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.2% percentile 6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 15.9% 15.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Fundamental Attribution E⌠Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.5% 8.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst