Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinese Intelligence results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 486 hits. Analysis detected 2,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,773 of 16,562 topics). This Chinese Intelligence is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Chinese Intelligence
Topic details
Total words: 2,184
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.6%14.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.3%22.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos