Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinatown (manhattan) results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 2,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,764 of 16,562 topics). This Chinatown (manhattan) is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Chinatown (manhattan)
Topic details
Total words: 2,116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.3% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.0%15.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.7%12.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.8%8.8%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Special Pleading: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos