Topic summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China's Military Expansion results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (4,968 of 16,562 topics). This China's Military Expansion is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
China's Military Expansion
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠70%China's Military Expansion (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.0% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.2%22.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.4%7.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The Pacific's True Rogue State⁠35%
Quillette⁠64%By Aaron Sarin⁠50%7/14/2026, 5:54:35 PM