Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China’s Economy results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 434 hits. Analysis detected 2,847 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,098 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,954 of 16,558 topics). This China’s Economy is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
China’s Economy
Topic details
Total words: 4,098
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos