Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video1,242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China Brief results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 450 hits. Analysis detected 2,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,726 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (11,910 of 15,689 topics). This China Brief is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
China Brief
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,726
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.1%12.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos