Author summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 1,242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Palmer results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 450 hits . Analysis detected 2,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,726 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,468 of 6,529 authors). This James Palmer is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. James Palmer
Author details
Total words: 3,726
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 7.9% 7.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst