Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Children's Literature results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Indoctrination, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 2,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,259 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (13,816 of 15,388 topics). This Children's Literature is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Children's Literature
Topic details
Total words: 6,259
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

10% percentile
025507510010.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos