CBC Arts46%

Mac Barnett believes children’s literature deserves a grown-up conversation 51%

By Sabina Wex0%

5/14/2026, 8:20:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 1,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 679 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.3% and a BS Rank of 51% (9,983 of 20,370 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the article peer group.

When Mac Barnett tells people that he’s a children’s author, they often ask the same question: “Do you think you'll ever write a real book?” 
The reaction from the U.S. 
National Ambassador for Young People's Literature is also always the same: 
“I say no, because I'm furious,” he tells Q guest host Gill Deacon. 
“And I say, ‘And by the way, kids' books are real books.’ 
And if you do not believe that children's books are real books, then you don't believe children are real people.” 
Barnett points out that nobody would ask a pediatrician if they’re going to work with “real” adult bodies one day. 
“There is this inconsistency… We think of pediatricians as specialists. 
We want them to be the very smartest, to know everything an internist knows but also to have this specialized knowledge of the lives and bodies of kids,” he says. 
“I don't know why we think that writing a kid’s book would be any easier, any less serious than writing a book for adults.” 
In reaction to these infuriating conversations, Barnett did something he said he never would do: he wrote a book for grown-ups. 
In Make Believe: On Telling Stories to Children, Barnett argues that children’s literature ought to be taken as seriously as adult literature. 
Barnett discovered the complexity of children’s books while he was in university, studying difficult medieval Icelandic poetry. 
When he went to work as a camp counsellor during the summer, he realized that the children’s books he read to four-year-olds weren’t dissimilar to the Icelandic poetry he studied; they both were intertextual and meta-fictional. 
Think of the sophistication of books such as Where the Wild Things Are or Goodnight Moon. 
“There’s a reason that there’s such a rich history of experimental literature in children’s books,” Barnett explains. 
“It’s because childhood itself is experimental, that is what you're doing. 
You are figuring out the world, you are constantly thrown into situations where you don't understand the rules and you have to pay attention and figure them out  and that's what you have to do [when you read] a book.” 
In Make Believe, Barnett argues that many modern children’s authors refuse to engage with children this way. 
They write books at children rather than for children, focusing on moral instruction and pedagogy. 
But the most popular children’s books talk with children. 
For example, Harriet the Spy is about a girl who writes a burn book about her classmates, and they shun her when they discover it. 
At the end of the book, Harriet’s nanny tells her to apologize to her classmates, even though she won’t mean it. 
The nanny explains that because Harriet is a writer, she must observe the good and the bad in people, but also needs to play nice because she has to go to school and have a social life. 
Barnett explains that the 1964 novel remains popular with kids because it’s “honest” and doesn’t turn away from the complexities of childhood. 
“Darkness, bad behavior, feelings kids have, horrible things that kids see their classmates do every day, or maybe even do themselves…. 
When these things are excluded from literature, a kid is going to say, either, ‘My life is not reflected in books, so I'm going to find another form of art, another form of entertainment that reflects the full spectrum of who I am.’ 
“Or even worse, they might say… ‘I don't see any of my dark thoughts or these horrible things happening in books. 
There must be something wrong with me.’ 
And that's a terrible thing.” 
Listen to the full interview with Mac Barnett to hear him talk about his favourite children’s authors, his approach to writing for kids and what to do about the current literacy crisis. 
His newest book, Make Believe: On Telling Stories to Children, is available now. 
The full interview with Marc Barnett is available on our podcast, Q with Tom Power. 
Listen and follow wherever you get your podcasts. 
Interview with Marc Barnett produced by Ben Edwards. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.9%Sabina Wex: 3.3%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.1%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Sabina Wex: 3.5%CBC: 3.2%Availability Heuristic9.0%This article: 2.9%Sabina Wex: 1.3%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.9%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.9%CBC: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 1.0%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Sabina Wex: 2.3%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.4%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.3%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Sabina Wex: 0.3%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 3.1%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.0%Sabina Wex: 1.7%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias13.0%This article: 15.5%Sabina Wex: 5.3%CBC: 5.7%Negativity Bias15.5%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 1.3%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Sabina Wex: 1.9%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error6.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.1%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.4%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Sabina Wex: 4.4%CBC: 3.7%Halo Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.4%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.1%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.0%Sabina Wex: 2.3%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority5.0%This article: 5.2%Sabina Wex: 2.2%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma5.2%This article: 6.3%Sabina Wex: 0.7%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope6.3%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.6%Sabina Wex: 5.7%CBC: 4.9%Hasty Generalization19.6%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.0%Sabina Wex: 3.3%CBC: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion8.0%This article: 2.9%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question2.9%This article: 6.3%Sabina Wex: 2.6%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.3%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.9%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature2.9%This article: 6.0%Sabina Wex: 0.6%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division6.0%This article: 11.9%Sabina Wex: 4.7%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal11.9%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.6%Sabina Wex: 3.6%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.6%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.7%Sabina Wex: 1.0%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote2.7%This article: 8.8%Sabina Wex: 1.3%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection8.8%This article: 27.5%Sabina Wex: 3.8%CBC: 4.9%Biased Writer Voice27.5%This article: 17.2%Sabina Wex: 2.3%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination17.2%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.1%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Sabina Wex: 6.2%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.0%

679 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker1.9%attributed speech666writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageGill Deacon • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Gill Deacon

100%flagged-word coverage
13 attributed words100% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+99.2 ptsWriter: 0.8%Gill Deacon: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+92.9 ptsWriter: 7.1%Gill Deacon: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-28.1 ptsWriter: 28.1%Gill Deacon: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-17.6 ptsWriter: 17.6%Gill Deacon: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.2 ptsWriter: 10.2%Gill Deacon: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.