Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Children And Technology results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 1,756 faulty-reasoning hits from 984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,572 of 16,562 topics). This Children And Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Children And Technology
Topic details
Total words: 984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.5% percentile
8.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles984 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 22.6%22.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 37.8%37.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 21.4%21.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 22.5%22.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.3%5.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 37.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos