WIRED16%

Some Kids Will Never Think AI Is Cool 90%

By Elana Klein99%

7/24/2026, 3:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 58.8% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 787 faulty-reasoning hits from 328 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 83.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,189 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the article peer group.

Forget cheating on homework and chatbot friends. 
Some kids are getting in on a new AI trend: thinking it sucks. 
In the four years since chatbots went mainstream, and their marketing campaigns went into overdrive, young people have grown increasingly skeptical of the hype around LLMs. 
Yes, many of them still use the tech for school assignments and companionship, but according to market research firm YPulse, 37 percent of teens aged 13 to 17 cringe when they see AI content like music and videos, and more than half worry about misinformation and deepfakes. 
The polling on youthful AI attitudes shows a great deal of contradiction. 
Adoption rates are high, with a majority of America’s teens reporting they use chatbots, but enthusiasm is mixed. 
A recent Pew Research report found that while many teens think AI will be good for them personally, over a fourth of their cohort believe AI will have a negative impact on society in the next 20 years, citing job loss, the decline of critical thinking skills, and environmental impacts as concerns. 
Young people typically adopt new consumer technology eagerly, but Melanie Green, a communications professor at the University at Buffalo, says AI is different. 
This time, the moral panic isn’t coming from older generations—in fact, kids are turned off by the way AI is being pushed on them by adults and tech corporations. 
They’re also, Green says, “acutely aware that whatever disruption happens, their generation is going to be bearing the brunt of it.” 
Ergo, the eye-rolls. 
On Bluesky, parents bond over their kids’ distrust of AI, with many claiming that their children come home saying “that’s AI” to mean “that’s BS.” 
On Reddit, educators share that students—even those who use AI—worry about its consequences and can’t stand the art it produces. 
WIRED spoke to young people, their parents, and their teachers to find out why some kids don’t want to be on the AI bandwagon. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 25.6%Elana Klein: 8.5%WIRED: 1.9%Confirmation Bias25.6%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Elana Klein: 6.6%WIRED: 2.9%Availability Heuristic13.7%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 2.3%WIRED: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 2.9%WIRED: 4.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.5%Elana Klein: 1.8%WIRED: 0.5%Status Quo Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 24.7%Elana Klein: 22.6%WIRED: 1.4%Pessimism Bias24.7%This article: 58.8%Elana Klein: 37.8%WIRED: 5.9%Negativity Bias58.8%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Elana Klein: 5.3%WIRED: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error7.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Elana Klein: 2.9%WIRED: 1.0%In-Group Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 2.9%WIRED: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 1.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.9%Elana Klein: 5.3%WIRED: 1.0%Recency Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 37.2%Elana Klein: 22.5%WIRED: 3.2%Appeal to Authority37.2%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.4%Elana Klein: 21.4%WIRED: 4.5%Hasty Generalization6.4%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.8%Elana Klein: 5.1%WIRED: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion8.8%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 14.3%Elana Klein: 4.8%WIRED: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.3%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.7%Elana Klein: 13.7%WIRED: 3.6%Anecdotal13.7%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 1.2%WIRED: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 2.5%WIRED: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.3%Elana Klein: 7.4%WIRED: 4.0%Biased Writer Voice7.3%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.7%WIRED: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elana Klein: 0.0%WIRED: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

328 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers52%attributed speech156writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageYPulse • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coveragePew Research • 52 words • 0.0% coverageMelanie Green • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMelanie Green • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMelanie Green • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Pew Research

100%flagged-word coverage
52 attributed words30% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.4 ptsWriter: 15.4%Pew Research: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.