Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Childhood Trauma results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 389 hits. Analysis detected 2,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Childhood Trauma is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Childhood Trauma
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Childhood Trauma (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,568
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos