Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Childhood Immunization Schedules results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 1,269 hits. Analysis detected 5,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,123 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,021 of 16,562 topics). This Childhood Immunization Schedules is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Childhood Immunization Schedules
Topic details
Total words: 3,123
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 40.6%40.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 34.5%34.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 40.6%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 34.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos