Topic summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos689 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Childcare Policy results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 426 hits. Analysis detected 2,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,756 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (7,887 of 22,495 topics). This Childcare Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Childcare Policy
Topic details
Total words: 2,756
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.5%15.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos