Topic summary
⁠71%2 analyzed articles/videos2,800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Childcare Funding results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,135 hits. Analysis detected 7,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,400 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,066 of 16,562 topics). This Childcare Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Childcare Funding
Topic details
Total words: 8,400
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos