Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Sexual Abuse Materials (csam) results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.6% saturation with 815 hits. Analysis detected 3,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,958 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,117 of 16,562 topics). This Child Sexual Abuse Materials (csam) is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Child Sexual Abuse Materials (csam)
Topic details
Total words: 1,958
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.2% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 41.6%41.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 27.4%27.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 34.1%34.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.5%15.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 41.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 34.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos