Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Psychology results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 3,104 hits. Analysis detected 20,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,882 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,512 of 16,562 topics). This Child Psychology is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Child Psychology
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 13,882
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.4%22.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.1%19.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos