Topic summary
⁠17%3 analyzed articles/videos1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Neglect results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 652 hits. Analysis detected 3,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,708 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,401 of 16,503 topics). This Child Neglect is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Child Neglect
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,708
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos