Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Abuse Allegations results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 533 hits. Analysis detected 2,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,196 of 16,562 topics). This Child Abuse Allegations is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Child Abuse Allegations
Topic details
Total words: 2,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.7% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 25.4%25.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.5%9.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.0%19.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos