Topic summary
⁠11%2 analyzed articles/videos1,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Culture results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 616 hits. Analysis detected 4,441 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,608 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,183 of 16,559 topics). This Chicago Culture is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Chicago Culture
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,608
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos