Topic summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Bears results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Recency Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 290 hits . Analysis detected 1,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (5,971 of 16,562 topics). This Chicago Bears is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Chicago Bears
Topic details
Total words: 1,602
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Recency Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 10.2%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst