Topic summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video1,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Arts Scene results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 402 hits. Analysis detected 2,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,339 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,039 of 16,562 topics). This Chicago Arts Scene is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Chicago Arts Scene
Topic details
Total words: 3,339
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos