Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chicago Architecture results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Unattributed Quote , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 175 hits . Analysis detected 1,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,350 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Chicago Architecture is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Chicago Architecture
Topic details
Total words: 1,350
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1% Red Herring: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst