Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chef Transformation results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 2,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,505 of 15,753 topics). This Chef Transformation is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Chef Transformation
Topic details
Total words: 3,316
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos