Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chef Joshua Gil results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 977 hits. Analysis detected 3,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,330 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,847 topics). This Chef Joshua Gil is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chef Joshua Gil
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,330
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.3%29.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 28.5%28.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.9%12.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 2.8%2.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos