Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Cheating results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Burden of Proof, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 511 hits. Analysis detected 3,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Cheating is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Cheating
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,844
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 18.0%18.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.8%15.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos