Topic summary
97% 2 analyzed articles/videos 715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chatgpt results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 929 hits . Analysis detected 5,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,121 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,119 of 16,562 topics). This Chatgpt is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Chatgpt
Topic details
Total words: 2,121
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.2% percentile 7.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 43.8% 43.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 38.7% 38.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 17.8% 17.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 20.2% 20.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 35.8% 35.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 13.0% 13.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Topic 43.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 38.7%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Topic 35.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst