Topic summary
83% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chatbots results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,596 hits . Analysis detected 10,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,155 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (8,815 of 15,684 topics). This Chatbots is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group. Chatbots
Topic details
Total words: 9,155
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst