Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blake Brittain results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 57.6% saturation with 686 hits . Analysis detected 3,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,191 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 96% (305 of 6,316 authors). This Blake Brittain is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group. Blake Brittain
Author details
Total words: 1,191
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.2% percentile 10.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 57.6% 57.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 42.7% 42.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 24.4% 24.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 29.6% 29.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 21.7% 21.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 12.3% 12.3% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.7% 9.7% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 57.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 42.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 29.6%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 24.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 21.7%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Author 17.8%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 13.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 9.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Middle Ground: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst