Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charity Misuse results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 62.8% saturation with 977 hits. Analysis detected 3,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (893 of 16,562 topics). This Charity Misuse is worse (more manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group.
Charity Misuse
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,556
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510094.6% percentile
11.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 62.8%62.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 50.1%50.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 39.0%39.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 13.1%13.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 62.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 50.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 39.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 25.8%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos