Topic summary
ā 72% 1 analyzed article/video 2,012 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charity Management results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 2,509 hits . Analysis detected 11,641 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ā 56% (7,000 of 15,878 topics). This Charity Management is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Charity Management
Topic details
Total words: 8,048
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.9% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 31.2% 31.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Tu Quoque: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst