Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Charities And Ngos results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 68.7% saturation with 1,678 hits. Analysis detected 6,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,442 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Charities And Ngos is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Charities And Ngos
Topic details
Total words: 2,442
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 68.7%68.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 35.7%35.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 28.5%28.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 14.6%14.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 68.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 35.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos