Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Charitable Giving results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 1,097 hits. Analysis detected 7,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,824 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Charitable Giving is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Charitable Giving
Topic details
Total words: 4,824
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 22.7%22.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.5%19.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.0%15.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos