Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charging results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 849 hits. Analysis detected 3,312 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,014 of 16,562 topics). This Charging is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Charging
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 20.8%20.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos