Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charges results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 1,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,193 of 16,562 topics). This Charges is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Charges
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,268
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos